<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Purpose on BonesMoses.org</title>
    <link>https://bonesmoses.org/tags/purpose/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Purpose on BonesMoses.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2024 06:16:19 -0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://bonesmoses.org/tags/purpose/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Seeking Purpose</title>
      <link>https://bonesmoses.org/2024/seeking-purpose/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2024 06:16:19 -0600</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://bonesmoses.org/2024/seeking-purpose/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There&amp;rsquo;s a phrase that&amp;rsquo;s now become ubiquitous on various parts of the internet, and it goes like this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The purpose of a system is what it does.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At first glance it&amp;rsquo;s a meaningless &lt;em&gt;non sequitur&lt;/em&gt;, a sort of self-referencing zen koan seeking to make something simple seem profound. &lt;em&gt;Obviously&lt;/em&gt; systems work as they&amp;rsquo;re designed, right? It&amp;rsquo;s tempting to discount it out of hand and move on. And yet, there&amp;rsquo;s a lot of linguistic trickery going on here that I want to unpack, and it carries &lt;em&gt;far&lt;/em&gt; deeper implications than mere language.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
